A personal thought in physics, specifically when it comes to forces, is the differences between coherence and incoherence.

I heard an interesting aurgument the other day dealing with this. Take light for example. A 5 watt light bulb is absolutely worthless, you can't even read or light anything with it. But on the other hand a 5 watt laser will burn a hole through your ass. But 5 watts is 5 watts, correct? So what's the difference? Coherency is the difference.

I believe this applies with all forces. Most forces or anything you find in nature is naturally incoherent. It's up to us to find ways to create methods of taking these incoherent forces and making them coherent.

Imagine if we could take gravity, whatever may be the true cause of it (providing it is truly a force, which some would argue that it's not). But for the sake of debate this idea and according to physics gravity is a force.

So if we could take gravity, which seems to be incoherent (a strong force that is spread out over a vast distance creating the illusion of not being very strong), that could explain why it's not a very strong force, yet is. But if we could make it coherent (just like the 5 watt light/laser), then we would have a very strong tool.

Take this knowledge of incoherence and coherence and apply it when thinking of other forces and many other things in the science world.

See what kind of ideas you can come up with.

What are your thoughts on this coherence and Incoherence idea?

What about gravity? Is it really a force? Is it incoherent? Could it be made coherent?

Do we have anything now that could possibility relate to or act as a coherent version of gravity? Say an electromagnet of some sort? After all the holy grailof physics is to unify everything.

What are your guys thoughts?

Time for some critical thinking!